People v. Howard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘We have considered the other contentions raised by defendant, including those raised in his pro se supplemental brief, and conclude that they are without merit.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• John Howard v. Hans G. Walker
  Second Circuit· 2005-04-26· cited 72×
• People v. Mateo
  New York County Courts· 1997-08-25· cited 15×
• People v. Solomon
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-03-28· cited 9×
• People v. Walker
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2000-12-27· cited 3×
• People v. Hogan
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2004-09-27

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Bornholdt
  New York Court of Appeals· 1973-10-23· cited 380×
• Victory v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1974-04-01· cited 148×
• People v. Matos
  New York Court of Appeals· 1994-02-22· cited 37×
• People v. Santanella
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1978-05-29· cited 13×
• Tamilio v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1979-06-25· cited 6×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1997-05-30· cited 3×