Second Circuit· 4/26/2005

John Howard v. Hans G. Walker

Citations

406 F.3d 114
2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 7110
2005 WL 954884

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

granting writ where state court engaged in an unreasonable application of established law, resulting in constitutional error, and error was not harmless
noting that when the “reliability of certain facts accepted by the expert is questionable,” the court can rely on “the exercise and process of cross-examination [to] allow a [party] to bring any such factual disputes to the attention of the jury”
“If th[e] court finds that the state court engaged in an unreasonable application of established law, resulting in constitutional error, it must next consider whether such error was harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Pooler, Hall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.