People v. HOMMERSON

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that defense counsel may have elected to not object to testimony on marital privilege grounds so as to “delve into . . . conversations [that] help[ed] establish his theory of the case”
• “Since we find *** that no error occurred, we do not need to perform a plain-error analysis”
• the defendant’s whereabouts were critical, yet he never gave the police a consistent explanation of them
• false exculpatory statements are evidence of consciousness of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).