Skip to main content

People v. Ellis

Citations

  • 765 N.E.2d 991
  • 199 Ill. 2d 28
  • 262 Ill. Dec. 383
  • 2002 Ill. LEXIS 288

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a substantive difference between remaining silent and actively lying in addressing the constitutionality of the related offense of obstructing justice
  • finding a substantive difference between remaining silent and actively lying in addressing the constitutionality of the related offense of obstructing justice
  • in effecting legislative intent by viewing the statute’s plain language, “[the court] must not depart from the statute’s plain language by reading into it exceptions, limitations, or conditions the legislature did not express”
  • in effecting legislative intent by viewing the statute’s plain language, “[the court] must not depart from the statute’s plain language by reading into it exceptions, limitations, or conditions the legislature did not express”
  • statutes are read as a whole, so that interpretation of the language does not render any part meaningless or superfluous, and the words and phrases are construed in light of other relevant provisions of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kilbride

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

34 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.