People v. Hochheimer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the Board’s determination that the agency proved it would have removed the petitioner absent his whistleblowing disclosures despite the lack of comparator evidence
• “The lack of evidence on the third Carr factor appears neutral[.]”
• “The lack of evidence on the third Carr factor appears neutral[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).