Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/4/2004
People v. Haycraft
Citations
- 811 N.E.2d 747
- 285 Ill. Dec. 260
- 349 Ill. App. 3d 416
- 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 653
- 2004 WL 1260104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- vacating the defendant’s conviction and sentence for criminal drug conspiracy where he was also convicted of unlawful manufacture of a controlled substance
- noting a “forensic chemist later identified [the mixture at issue] as methamphetamine”
- The $5-per-day credit “may be applied against either the statutory assessment or the street value fine, but not both”
- The $5-per-day credit “may be applied against either the statutory assessment or the street value fine, but not both.”
- the $5-per-day credit “may be applied against either the statutory assessment or the street value fine, but not both”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hopkins, Kuehn, Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. McCartyIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-19· cited 251×
- People v. WardAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-02-02· cited 119×
- People v. FortAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-11-15· cited 29×
- People v. GorosteataAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-06-15· cited 28×
- Cretton v. Protestant Memorial Medical Center, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-02-28· cited 21×
- People v. StroudAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-30· cited 18×
- People v. HumphreyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-09-30· cited 17×
- People v. FortAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-05-29· cited 17×
- People v. YoungbloodAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-05-17· cited 15×
- Coffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 2004-09-23· cited 8×
- Barth v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-12-06· cited 6×
- People v. ThornburgAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-08-12· cited 6×
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-06-23· cited 6×
- People v. ReynoldsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-05-24· cited 5×
- People v. TilleyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-09-29· cited 3×
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-08-10· cited 3×
- People v. BeachemAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-06-08· cited 3×
- People v. GorosteataAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-02-09
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 3,147×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 2,149×
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- People v. AlbaneseIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-10-19· cited 1,967×
- Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court· 1984-01-20· cited 1,778×
- Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court· 1978-05-31· cited 1,386×
- Illinois v. McArthurSupreme Court· 2001-02-20· cited 735×
- People v. SorensonIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 440×
- People v. GhernaIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-01-24· cited 268×
- People v. ByronIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-01-19· cited 190×
- People v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-09-20· cited 172×
- People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-06-19· cited 154×
- People v. LampitokIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-09-18· cited 144×
- People v. HortonIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 136×
- People v. FlowersIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-11-20· cited 123×
Other cases named People v. Haycraft
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.