People v. Harre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant who had permission to be on grounds for limited purpose of cutting weeds not legitimately present inside house, so he could not challenge search of house
• “Where the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress [i]s not a patently meritorious issue, defendant's appellate counsel [i]s not ineffective for failing to raise the issue on direct appeal”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).