Skip to main content

People v. Garrett

Citations

  • 667 N.E.2d 130
  • 281 Ill. App. 3d 535
  • 217 Ill. Dec. 337
  • 1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the defendant’s conviction of criminal sexual assault based on anal penetration, holding that “[t]he touching of the anus on the outside by a finger of a person is insufficient to support a conviction for criminal sexual assault”
  • reversing the defendant's conviction of criminal sexual assault based on anal penetration, holding that \[t]he touching of the anus on the outside by a finger of a person is insufficient to support a conviction for criminal sexual assault\
  • conviction for criminal sexual assault based upon anal penetration reversed where evidence was inconclusive as to whether there was even a slight intrusion into the victim’s anus
  • evidence defendant \touched\ anus insufficient for penetration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hopkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.