People v. Harding

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• because “attempt” language was included in the child abduction statute, the court concluded the legislature meant to preclude application of the general attempt statute to defendant’s actions
• because “attempt” language was included in the child abduction statute, the court concluded the legislature meant to preclude application of the general attempt statute to defendant’s actions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Boyce
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2015-03-31· cited 14×
• People v. Pikes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-09-27· cited 9×
• People v. Cervantes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-01-20· cited 8×
• People v. Smart
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2023-09-15· cited 6×

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Illgen
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-11-21· cited 710×
• People v. Jones
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2006-12-21· cited 391×
• People v. Lindgren
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1980-02-22· cited 352×
• People v. Wilson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2005-01-21· cited 163×
• People v. Hauschild
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2007-06-07· cited 135×
• People v. Woodrum
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 123×
• People v. Placek
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-12-03· cited 108×
• People v. Wallace
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1974-05-29· cited 52×
• People v. Harris
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-06-30· cited 40×
• People v. Luczak
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-14· cited 36×
• People v. Patten
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-06-09· cited 12×
• People v. Wishard
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-12-15· cited 6×
• People v. Agriesti
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-12-01· cited 6×