Skip to main content

People v. Hamilton

Citations

  • 638 N.W.2d 92
  • 465 Mich. 526

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an absence of statutory authority did not warrant application of the exclusionary rule where the statute was meant to protect the rights of autonomous local governments
  • holding that an absence of statutory authority did not warrant application of the exclusionary rule where the statute was meant to protect the rights of autonomous local governments
  • “A number of decisions establish that statutory violations do not render police actions unconstitutional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corrigan, Weaver, Taylor, Young, Markman, Cavanagh, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.