People v. Hamilton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• condoning expert testimony regarding defendant’s psychiatric makeup and its impact on statements he made to police, but prohibiting expert testimony regarding the truthfulness of those statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Matuszak
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2004-09-29· cited 698×
• People v. Kowalski
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2012-07-30· cited 198×
• Hannon v. State
  Wyoming Supreme Court· 2004-02-11· cited 61×
• People v. Page
  California Court of Appeal· 1991-12-31· cited 43×
• State v. King
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-08-18· cited 12×
• State of New Jersey v. David Granskie, Jr.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2013-10-16· cited 7×
• Amunga v. Jones
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-10-22· cited 5×
• People of Michigan v. Michael Shaun Lowrey
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2022-06-23

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Crane v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
• Lego v. Twomey
  Supreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
• State v. Kim
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 1982-05-27· cited 112×
• People v. Smith
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1986-05-29· cited 108×
• People v. Gilbert
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1974-08-27· cited 34×
• People v. Draper
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-04-08· cited 28×
• People v. Matlock
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-07-08· cited 24×
• People v. Byrd
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1984-04-16· cited 18×
• People v. Gerald Wells
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-12-16· cited 18×
• People v. Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-03-30· cited 16×
• People v. Skinner
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-08-05· cited 15×
• People v. Kirkpatrick
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1987-06-16· cited 13×