Skip to main content
· 12/12/2002

People v. Gee

Citations

  • 782 N.E.2d 1155
  • 99 N.Y.2d 158
  • 753 N.Y.S.2d 19
  • 2002 N.Y. LEXIS 3788

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the showing of surveillance video to a robbery witness was not an identification procedure because the witness was “simply ratifying the events as revealed in the videotape, without identifying any known individual as the robber”
  • “Undue suggestiveness lies at the heart of Wade jurisprudence, but that concern is not ordinarily implicated when (as here
  • “Undue suggestiveness lies at the heart of Wade jurisprudence, but that concern is not ordinarily implicated when (as here

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosenblatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.