Colorado Court of Appeals· 4/11/2002
People v. Gardner
Citations
- 55 P.3d 231
- 2002 Colo. App. LEXIS 559
- 2002 WL 538883
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The timeliness issue was not presented in the trial court, but [section] 16-5-402(1.5) . . . gives us discretion to deny relief on appeal on that ground nonetheless.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dailey, Ney, Roy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. CollierColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-11-30· cited 984×
- People v. RainerColorado Court of Appeals· 2013-04-11· cited 340×
- People v. WenzingerColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-07-13· cited 52×
- People v. HarrisonColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-05-23· cited 10×
- People v. MunkusColorado Court of Appeals· 2002-08-15· cited 8×
- People v. WenzingerColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-06-01· cited 1×
- People v. RomeroColorado Court of Appeals· 2015-02-12· cited 1×
- The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Lloyd E. COLLIERColorado Court of Appeals· 2006-11-30
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.