Skip to main content
· 8/15/2002

People v. Munkus

Citations

  • 60 P.3d 767
  • 2002 Colo. App. LEXIS 1428
  • 2002 WL 1879179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant’s “reformulated claims” were successive
  • Apprendi inapplicable when defendant sentenced within applicable statutory range following plea agreement, which constituted admission beyond a reasonable doubt to elements of the count charged

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sternberg, Taubman, Dailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.