Skip to main content

People v. Floyd

Citations

  • 72 P.3d 820
  • 1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 885
  • 31 Cal. 4th 179
  • 2003 Daily Journal DAR 8029
  • 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6400
  • 2003 Cal. LEXIS 4828

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s assertion that prospective legislation fails rational basis review and noting state’s legitimate interests in ensuring “penal laws will maintain their desired deterrent effect by carrying out the original prescribed punishment as written”
  • savings clause applied only to the purely ameliorative amendment in question passed by Proposition, \ameliorat[ing] the punishment for those persons convicted of nonviolent drug possession offenses who are eligible for its programs\ and \shall be applied prospectively\
  • ‘‘penal laws will maintain their desired deterrent effect by carrying out the original prescribed punishment as written’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baxter, Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

95 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.