Ex parte Rosenheim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence that the defendant was angry with the victim because the victim had failed to pay the defendant for drugs was admissible to show motive for the crimes, even though it incidentally placed the defendant’s character in issue
• that co-defendant was charged with additional crimes in joint trial did not require severance in absence of showing jury was confused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).