Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/26/1996

People v. Fields

Citations

675 N.E.2d 180
285 Ill. App. 3d 1020
221 Ill. Dec. 273
1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 986

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it was improper to admit witness’s statement regarding the defendant’s confession because “[t]he personal knowledge requirement limits the use of out-of-court statements to those events the witness actually observed”
holding that it was improper to admit witness's statement regarding the defendant's confession because \[t]he personal knowledge requirement limits the use of out-of-court statements to those events the witness actually observed\
finding that even “unnecessary” repetition of witness’s prior inconsistent statements did not rise to the level of prejudice
finding that even \unnecessary\ repetition of witness's prior inconsistent statements did not rise to the level of prejudice
following Salazar’s analysis and holding that the statements at issue were sufficiently inconsistent to be admissible under section 115—10.1 of the Code
following Salazar 's analysis and holding that the statements at issue were sufficiently inconsistent to be admissible under section 115-10.1 of the Code

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cerda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.