Skip to main content

People v. Branch

Citations

  • 462 N.E.2d 868
  • 123 Ill. App. 3d 245
  • 78 Ill. Dec. 749
  • 1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 1693

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • it was more likely than not that the court’s threat of overnight sequestration intimidated a juror into reaching a verdict
  • it was more likely than not that the court's threat of overnight sequestration intimidated a juror into reaching a verdict
  • trial court’s comments found to be coercive where they implied that the lone minority juror’s refusal to defer to the majority position should have disqualified him from jury service
  • trial court’s comments found to be coercive where they implied that the lone minority juror’s refusal to defer to the majority position should have disqualified him from jury service
  • “it appears well-settled that the trial court has a responsibility to proffer some type of guidance to a jury which has expressed its inability to achieve unanimity in its deliberations and has sought direction from the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.