Appellate Court of Illinois· 1/25/2006
People v. Eggleston
Citations
- 363 Ill. App. 3d 220
- 842 N.E.2d 1209
- 299 Ill. Dec. 857
- 2006 Ill. App. LEXIS 39
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting the defendant’s claim that his attorney was ineffective for stipulating to testimony rather than calling live witnesses where there was no evidence that the live testimony would “have added any more than the stipulation already covered”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barry, McDade
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- People v. BullIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-11-10· cited 417×
- People v. EnisIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-11-22· cited 377×
- People v. RameyIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-09-24· cited 232×
- People v. GilmoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-04-29· cited 48×
- People v. RedmondAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-30· cited 17×
- People v. WoodsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1991-10-11· cited 16×
- People v. BaltimoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-08-01· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.