Appellate Court of Illinois· 11/19/1993

People v. Durham

Citations

623 N.E.2d 1010
252 Ill. App. 3d 88
191 Ill. Dec. 420
1993 Ill. App. LEXIS 1733

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that evidence was insufficient to establish that the defendant intended to commit theft when entering store
concluding that evidence was insufficient to establish that the defendant intended to commit theft when entering store
reversing burglary conviction of the defendant who stole men’s suit where he carried nothing into store that would indicate an intent to commit a theft and his conduct was that of a normal shopper browsing items
reversing burglary conviction of the defendant who stole men’s suit where he carried nothing into store that would indicate an intent to commit a theft and his conduct was that of a normal shopper browsing items
no evidence that the defendant “was carrying out some previously devised plan rather than taking advantage of an opportunity presented by the circumstances”
“A criminal intent formulated after a lawful entry will not satisfy the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lytton, McCuskey, Stouder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.