Skip to main content

People v. Boose

Citations

  • 487 N.E.2d 1088
  • 139 Ill. App. 3d 471
  • 94 Ill. Dec. 211
  • 1985 Ill. App. LEXIS 2845

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “[a] criminal intent formulated after a lawful entry will satisfy the offenses of larceny (retail theft) or burglary by illegally remaining. It will not, however, satisfy the offense of burglary by illegal entry.”
  • burglary convictions reversed due to lack of evidence of the defendants’ intent upon entering
  • burglary convictions reversed due to lack of evidence of the defendants' intent upon entering
  • “A criminal intent formulated after a lawful entry will - 10 - satisfy the offense[ ] of *** burglary by illegally remaining,” but “[i]t will not *** satisfy the offense of burglary by illegal entry.”
  • “A criminal intent formulated after a lawful entry will satisfy the offense[ ] of *** burglary by illegally remaining,” but “[i]t will not *** satisfy the offense of burglary by illegal entry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.