People v. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding a plate mounted upside down—though readable—was not “clearly legible” or easily readable because mounting the plate upside down made “the plate more difficult or confusing to read”
• concluding a plate mounted upside down — though readable — was not “clearly legible” or easily readable because mounting the plate upside down made “the plate more difficult or confusing to read”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. $45,000.00 in United States Currency
  Eighth Circuit· 2014-04-16· cited 17×
• People v. Fernandez
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-08-01· cited 12×
• Baranchik v. Fizulich
  California Court of Appeal· 2017-04-19· cited 11×
• JMR Construction v. Environmental Assessment etc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2016-01-28
• People v. Carkhum-Murphy
  California Court of Appeal· 2019-10-21

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Whren v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
• People v. Johnson
  California Supreme Court· 1980-02-29· cited 2,018×
• People v. Glaser
  California Supreme Court· 1995-10-12· cited 362×
• DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1992-05-04· cited 338×
• People v. Mayberry
  California Supreme Court· 1975-09-05· cited 313×
• People v. Coronado
  California Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 303×
• People v. Woods
  California Supreme Court· 1999-08-26· cited 249×
• People v. Scott
  California Supreme Court· 1978-05-16· cited 222×
• Kizer v. Hanna
  California Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 91×
• People v. White
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-11-15· cited 20×