Appellate Court of Illinois· 3/6/2007
People v. Downs
Citations
- 864 N.E.2d 320
- 371 Ill. App. 3d 1187
- 309 Ill. Dec. 454
- 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- where judicial interpretation of statute has not evoked an amendment, drafters are presumed to acquiesce in the court's exposition of the intent behind the statute
- where judicial interpretation of statute has not evoked an amendment, drafters are presumed to acquiesce in the court’s exposition of the intent behind the statute
- “The doctrine of sovereign immunity bars only actions brought against the State, not actions brought by the state.”
- where judicial interpretation of statute has not provoked an amendment, drafters are presumed to acquiesce in the judicial exposition of the intent behind the statute or the rule
- where judicial interpretation of statute has not provoked an amendment, drafters are presumed to acquiesce in the judicial exposition of the intent behind the statute or the rule
- where judicial interpretation of statute has not provoked an amendment, drafters are presumed to acquiesce in the judicial exposition of the intent behind the statute or the rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Welch
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. MarkerIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-04-16· cited 86×
- People v. KastmanIllinois Supreme Court· 2022-09-22· cited 16×
- People v. MarkerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-05-01· cited 14×
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-01-09· cited 11×
- People v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-06-26· cited 8×
- People v. KastmanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-08-19· cited 3×
- People v. SharpAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-02-25· cited 2×
- Oakridge Development Co. v. Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-09-17· cited 2×
- Board of Land and Natural Resources v. Crabtree. Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition, filed 08/09/2023. S.Ct. Order Denying Petition, filed 08/24/2023 [ada].Hawaii Supreme Court· 2024-04-18· cited 2×
- Oakridge Development v. Property Tax AppealAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-11-15
- Oakridge Development Company v. The Property Tax Appeal BoardAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-11-15
- Arellano v. The Department of Human ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-06-16
- State v. Lead Industries AssociationSuperior Court of Rhode Island· 2009-01-22
- People v. CoopAppellate Court of Illinois· 2023-02-01
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- The People v. HairstonIllinois Supreme Court· 1970-09-29· cited 411×
- People Ex Rel. Klaeren v. Village of LisleIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-10-18· cited 104×
- People v. TrainorIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-05-24· cited 102×
- People Ex Rel. Conn v. RandolphIllinois Supreme Court· 1966-08-16· cited 97×
- People Ex Rel. Manning v. NickersonIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 50×
- Department of Revenue v. Appellate CourtIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-09-20· cited 46×
- People Ex Rel. Klaeren v. Village of LisleAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-10-13· cited 26×
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. DavenportAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-30· cited 10×
- People v. WilcoxenAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-07-27· cited 8×
- McGee v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-08-14· cited 2×
- In re Detention of Campbell Opinion text corrected Mar. 26, 2001Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-03-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.