Department of Revenue v. Appellate Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, in the absence of a specific reference to the State, terms such as \any person\ and \either party\ were not specific enough to impose fees and costs against the Department for the printing of transcripts
• where this court stated that unless there was specific reference to the State, a statute is insufficient to permit the State to be held liable for costs
• the State did not consent to the payment of appeal costs where the statute authorizing the imposition of costs did not reference the State
• the State’s waiver of immunity must be expressed through specific legislative authorization and must appear in affirmative statutory language
• the State did not consent to the payment of appeal costs where the statute authorizing the imposition of costs did not reference the State
• where this court stated that unless there was specific reference to the State, a statute is insufficient to permit the State to be held liable for costs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).