People v. David

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Completeness [of a bystander’s report] is necessary in order that undue emphasis not be placed on isolated matters that may be out of context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Loggins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-07-03· cited 41×
• People v. Tobias
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-06-19· cited 21×
• People v. Caserta
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-04-24· cited 15×
• People v. Malley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-01-28· cited 9×
• People v. Berger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-11-01· cited 9×
• People v. Hernandez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2012-06-27· cited 7×
• People v. Sheley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2018-02-16· cited 2×
• People v. Gold
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1981-09-02· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Edwards
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-10-06· cited 102×
• The PEOPLE v. Smith
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1969-05-28· cited 58×
• People v. Ring
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1967-11-28· cited 9×