Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/30/2003

People v. Daly

Citations

792 N.E.2d 446
341 Ill. App. 3d 372
275 Ill. Dec. 215
2003 Ill. App. LEXIS 865

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting the defense counsel “could not properly cross-examine [the witness] about any” matters connected with the defense counsel’s prior representation
the per se conflict rule is designed to avoid unfairness to the defendant, who may not be able to determine whether his representation was affected by the conflict
“In a situation where defense counsel has previously represented one of the State’s witnesses, a per se conflict of interest exists if the professional relationship between counsel and the witness is contemporaneous with counsel’s representation of defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.