People v. Cummings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that the number of trials is not a violation of due process unless it also places the defendant in double jeopardy”
• holding \that the number of trials is not a violation of due process unless it also places the defendant in double jeopardy\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Sierb
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1998-03-17· cited 114×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1988-04-05· cited 74×
• People v. Wright
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1982-03-29· cited 6×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Benton v. Maryland
  Supreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
• United States v. Perez
  Supreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 1,814×
• The People v. Nilsson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-01-21· cited 151×
• United States v. Luis Castellanos
  Second Circuit· 1973-05-04· cited 42×
• Preston v. Blackledge
  E.D. North Carolina· 1971-10-01· cited 21×
• People v. Oden
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-02-13· cited 15×