Michigan Supreme Court· 7/9/2003

People v. Cress

Citations

664 N.W.2d 174
468 Mich. 678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that an appellate court is prohibited from “substituting its judicial opinion regarding . . . credibility [and valuation of witness testimony] for that of the trial court”
“[The confessor’s] testimony (even presuming he would testify at a new trial) would not make a different result probable on retrial.”
“[The confessor’s] testimony (even presuming he would testify at a new trial) would not make a different result probable on retrial.”
“[The -12- confessor’s] testimony (even presuming he would testify at a new trial) would not make a different result probable retrial.”
internal quotations to People v Johnson, 451 Mich 115, 118 n 6, 545 NW2d 637 (1996) omitted
internal quotations to People v Johnson, 451 Mich 115, 118 n 6, 545 NW2d 637 (1996) omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cavanagh, Kelly, Weaver, Taylor, Young, Markman, Corrigan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Cress

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.