Skip to main content

People v. Covington

Citations

  • 917 N.E.2d 618
  • 334 Ill. Dec. 792
  • 395 Ill. App. 3d 996
  • 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 1022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the trial court erred in entering a criminal contempt judgment against the defendant without providing the necessary criminal procedural rights where “at no point during the indirect criminal contempt proceeding was defendant admonished of his right to counsel”
  • allegedly erroneous findings are insufficient reasons to believe that a trial court has a personal bias for or against a litigant
  • allegedly erroneous findings are insufficient reasons to believe that a trial court has a personal bias for or against a litigant
  • “The penalties in a civil contempt case serve only to coerce the contemnor to comply with a court order, and they must cease when the contemnor complies.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • “The penalties in a civil contempt case serve only to coerce the contemnor to comply with a court order, and they must cease when the contemnor complies.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Myerscough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.