Skip to main content
· 9/21/2006

Best v. Best

Citations

  • 860 N.E.2d 240
  • 223 Ill. 2d 342
  • 307 Ill. Dec. 586
  • 2006 Ill. LEXIS 1114

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling that a finding is against the manifest weight of the evidence only if it is unreasonable, arbitrary and not based on the evidence presented
  • holding that finding of abuse need only be 15 supported by a preponderance of the evidence and such finding will be reversed only if it is against the manifest weight of the evidence
  • noting that we will not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court regarding the credibility of witnesses, the weight to be given the evidence, or the inferences to be drawn
  • noting that we will not substitute our judgment for that of the trial court regarding the credibility of witnesses, the weight to be given the evidence, or the inferences to be drawn
  • stating all findings made under the preponderance standard are reviewed under the manifest weight standard
  • findings based on the presence of a preponderance of the evidence are reviewed under the manifest weight standard of review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.