People v. Compan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summarizing Crawford testimonial statements as generally being (1) solemn or formal statements, (2) made for the purpose of proving or establishing facts in judicial proceedings, (8
• Colorado courts should continue to apply Roberts-Dement test to determine whether state constitutional right of confrontation was violated by introduction of nontestimonial hearsay
• admissibility of nontestimonial hearsay to be determined under People v. Dement, 661 P.2d 675 (Colo. 1983)
• admissibility of nontestimonial hearsay to be determined under People v. Dement, 661 P.2d 675 (Colo.1983)
• testimonial statements under Crawford will generally be solemn or formal statements
• “Thus, it appears that testimonial statements under Crawford will generally be (1) solemn or formal statements (not casual or offhand remarks), (2) made for the purpose of proving or establishing facts in judicial proceedings (not for business or personal purposes), (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).