People v. Combs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a new sentencing hearing was not required when vacating some, but not all, of the defendant’s convictions after reviewing the circumstances of the crime and the trial judge’s statement regarding its brutal character

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Calva
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-12-23· cited 43×
• People v. Reed
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1998-07-27· cited 25×
• People v. Campos
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-02-28· cited 23×
• People v. Zarate
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-05-31· cited 19×
• Poeple v. Treadwell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2022-09-09· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• People v. King
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-05-20· cited 1,292×
• People v. Hattery
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-11-21· cited 248×
• People v. Johnson
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-04-20· cited 223×
• People v. Chandler
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-06-19· cited 178×
• People v. Alcazar
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-04-18· cited 45×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-12-18· cited 9×