People v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversal required where the State presented oral argument, the State used case law to support its oral argument, and the trial judge said that he had relied on the State’s arguments
• reversal required where the State presented oral argument, the State used case law to support its oral argument, and the trial judge said that he had relied on the State's arguments
• reversal required where the State presented oral argument, the State used case law to support its oral argument, and the trial judge said that he had relied on the State’s arguments
• reversal required where the State presented oral argument, the State used case law to support its oral argument, and the trial judge said that he had relied on the State's arguments
• reversal required where the State presented oral argument, the State used case law to support its oral argu­ment, and the trial judge said that he had relied on the State's arguments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Gaultney
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 583×
• People v. Dauer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-12-08· cited 14×
• People v. Barker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-03-08· cited 11×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Merritte
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-03-12· cited 14×
• People v. Mitchell
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-08-28· cited 11×
• People v. Clark
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-01-12· cited 2×