People v. Barker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding default procedures serve no useful purpose in the post-conviction review process
• reversal required where the trial judge requested argument from both parties
• reversal required where the trial judge requested argument from both parties
• reversal required where the trial judge requested argument from both parties
• reversal required where the trial judge requested argument from both parties
• re­ver­sal required where the trial judge requested argument from both parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Gaultney
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-12-19· cited 583×
• Bell v. State
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-02-12· cited 25×
• People v. Dauer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-12-08· cited 14×
• People v. Anderson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-05-23· cited 13×
• People v. Guillen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-06-02

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Neal
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-12-20· cited 58×
• People v. Rutkowski
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-03-11· cited 21×
• People v. Merritte
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-03-12· cited 14×
• People v. Clark
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-12-23· cited 6×