People v. Clark

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Motions under-rule [1.904(2)’s predecessor] are permitted so that courts may enlarge or modify findings based on evidence already in the record. They are not vehicles for parties to retry issues based on new facts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Kennebrew
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-03-18· cited 76×
• Pauline McKee v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc. and Ioc Black Hawk County, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2015-04-24· cited 50×
• People v. Hughes
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1996-07-29· cited 7×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Milbourn
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 1,306×
• People v. Broden
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1987-07-13· cited 130×
• People v. Dukes
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-05-07· cited 32×
• People v. Marshall Warner
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1991-08-20· cited 19×
• People v. Young
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1994-07-05· cited 16×