People v. Carr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Miranda inapplicable to admissions made at disciplinary hearing, but such statements cannot be used at a subsequent criminal trial on the underlying offense except for impeachment or rebuttal; inmate must be advised of these effects before testifying at hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Arthur v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1990-05-25· cited 84×
• People v. Wyngaard
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2000-07-20· cited 32×
• State v. Conley
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-05-25· cited 8×
• People v. Thomason
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-12-20· cited 7×
• People v. Wyngaard
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-03-10· cited 6×
• Kasprowicz v. Finck
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-01-20· cited 4×
• Gee v. Department of Corrections
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-04-16· cited 2×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Wolff v. McDonnell
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
• Baxter v. Palmigiano
  Supreme Court· 1976-04-20· cited 2,133×
• Garrity v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 1967-01-23· cited 1,543×
• Lefkowitz v. Turley
  Supreme Court· 1973-11-19· cited 1,102×
• People v. Reed
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 263×
• People v. Rocha
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1978-10-17· cited 27×
• People v. Hardenbrook
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1976-04-27· cited 21×
• People v. Ewing
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1980-07-24· cited 8×
• People v. D'AVANZO
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1983-04-20· cited 6×