People v. Calistro
Citations
- 218 Cal. Rptr. 3d 765
- 12 Cal. App. 5th 387
- 2017 Cal. App. LEXIS 509
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “While the newer CALCRIM instructions have been endorsed by the California Judicial Council and are generally viewed as superior to the older CALJIC instructions, the CALJIC instructions are not necessarily defective or inadequate.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-05-23· cited 1,227×
- People v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-07-03· cited 395×
- People v. Romero and SelfCalifornia Supreme Court· 2015-08-27· cited 288×
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court· 2014-08-21· cited 250×
- People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-12-17· cited 229×
- People v. GarzaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2005-05-19· cited 183×
- People v. JaramilloCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-04-26· cited 119×
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court· 1970-01-19· cited 85×
- People v. Nicole H.California Court of Appeal· 2016-02-16· cited 60×
- People v. StrongCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1994-11-15· cited 41×
- People v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-05-02· cited 29×
- People v. MalamutCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-03-24· cited 20×
- People v. CrattyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-12-22· cited 7×
Other cases named People v. Calistro
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.