People v. Brown
Citations
- 113 Cal. 35
- 45 P. 181
- 1896 Cal. LEXIS 740
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law—Judgment of Imprisonment and Fine—Imprisonment to Satisfy Fine—Void Provision.—Where a judgment of imprisonment has been rendered, and also a judgment of fine, there can be no imprisonment to satisfy the fine, and that portion of such a judgment which provides for imprisonment to satisfy the fine is void.</p> <p>Zd.—Construction of Penal Code—Enforcement of Fine—Judgment Lien—Execution.—Section 1205 of the Penal Code, which provides for imprisonment to satisfy a fine, only applies where there is no direct judgment of imprisonment; but section 1206, which makes a judgment imposing a fine a lien in like manner as a judgment for money in a civil action, and also section 1214, which provides that if a judgment is for a fine alone, execution may be issued thereon as on a judgment in a civil action, apply equally whether the judgment be one of fine coupled with a judgment for imprisonment, or whether it be simply a judgment of fine without a judgment of imprisonment.</p>
Judges: Garoutte
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. RalphCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-07-21· cited 123×
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-03-22· cited 78×
- In Re GoetzCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-09-25· cited 15×
- People v. SayerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1937-06-30· cited 13×
- People v. PuenteSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1908-02-17
- Carrión v. PeopleSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1928-04-17
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.