People v. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ―It would be farcical to reverse because certain evidence should not have been admitted, knowing all the time that at a retrial it will be admissible.‖

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Garner
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-09-20· cited 27×
• People v. Jones
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-05-01· cited 19×
• People v. Moon
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-03-22· cited 11×
• People v. Stewart
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-05-21· cited 1×
• LEJUNE C. SMITH v. UNITED STATES
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-07-07

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Pointer v. Texas
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
• California v. Green
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
• People v. Wolff
  California Supreme Court· 1964-08-31· cited 209×
• People v. Chacon
  California Supreme Court· 1968-11-27· cited 172×
• People v. Johnson
  California Supreme Court· 1968-05-28· cited 127×
• People v. Stanley
  California Supreme Court· 1967-11-29· cited 85×
• People v. Sylvia
  California Supreme Court· 1960-05-10· cited 66×
• People v. Yslas
  California Supreme Court· 1865-07-01· cited 48×
• People v. Pierce
  California Court of Appeal· 1969-01-27· cited 30×
• People v. Keller
  California Court of Appeal· 1963-01-22· cited 24×
• People v. Cuevas
  California Court of Appeal· 1967-05-12· cited 8×