California Court of Appeal· 12/23/2011
People v. Bowman
Citations
- 202 Cal. App. 4th 353
- 136 Cal. Rptr. 3d 119
- 2011 Cal. App. LEXIS 1633
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “the Doyle rule did not prohibit the prosecution’s use of [defendant’s] selective silence” because the defendant did not state that he wanted to cease all further questioning or invoke his right of silence
- “We are persuaded in this case that the Doyle rule did not prohibit the prosecution’s use of Bowman’s selective silence as adoptive admissions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McConnell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court· 1993-06-07· cited 7,022×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court· 2010-06-01· cited 1,592×
- Anderson v. CharlesSupreme Court· 1980-08-11· cited 896×
- People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-10-27· cited 855×
- People v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-07-15· cited 452×
- People v. TateCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-07-08· cited 185×
- People v. SilvaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 170×
- Hale v. GibsonTenth Circuit· 2000-09-25· cited 163×
- State v. TaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-08-27· cited 140×
- People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-06-08· cited 95×
- People v. McReavyMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-19· cited 69×
- Hurd v. TerhuneNinth Circuit· 2010-08-23· cited 50×
- United States v. Philip Scott MayTenth Circuit· 1995-05-23· cited 50×
- United States v. Arthur Lee Burns, Jr.Eighth Circuit· 2002-01-10· cited 28×
- State v. SmartMissouri Court of Appeals· 1988-07-19· cited 19×
- People v. HurdCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1998-03-03· cited 17×
- State v. FlukerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-08-24· cited 9×
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-01-29· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.