People v. Binkowski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding statute requiring “stop at a limit line” mandates “a full stop before any part of the vehicle crosses the limit line”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Daniels
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-05-16· cited 8×
• People v. Overing
  Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 2015-08-26· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Whren v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
• People v. Zapien
  California Supreme Court· 1993-03-04· cited 691×
• Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV
  California Supreme Court· 1991-02-28· cited 457×
• People v. Leyba
  California Supreme Court· 1981-06-25· cited 319×
• People v. Coronado
  California Supreme Court· 1995-12-21· cited 303×
• People v. Lloyd
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-03-13· cited 42×
• People v. Granderson
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-10-30· cited 23×
• People v. Binkowski
  Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 2007-11-02· cited 10×