Skip to main content

People v. Bielecki

Citations

  • 964 P.2d 598
  • 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 4237
  • 1998 Colo. App. LEXIS 194
  • 1998 WL 455597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that district court did not abuse its discretion by giving legally correct, but inapplicable, instruction
  • relying upon Gray in holding that the waiver did not compromise a defendant's ability to prepare an effective defense
  • relying upon Gray in holding that the waiver did not compromise a defendant's ability to prepare an effective defense
  • a defendant must accept the burdens as well as the benefits that flow from the decision to assert such a defense
  • a defendant must accept the burdens as well as the benefits that flow from the decision to assert such a defense
  • “It is axiomatic that issues not raised in or decided by [the trial] court will not be addressed for the first time on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vogt, Taubman, Roy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Bielecki

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.