People v. Bennett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding officer’s seizure of the defendant was reasonable to enforce the defendant’s parking violation
• “On appeal, the Ninth Circuit [in Choudhry] held the parking violation justified the investigatory stop . . . At the outset, the Ninth Circuit 26 rejected Choudhry's distinction between criminal traffic violations and civil traffic violations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Paul Gresk, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Derek VanWinkle and Stacey VanWinkle on behalf of M v. and A v. their minor children v. Cortney Demetris, M.D.
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2018-05-10· cited 9×
• State of Iowa v. Jasmaine R. Warren
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-03-05

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Mapp v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
• Whren v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1996-05-15· cited 7,105×
• Delaware v. Prouse
  Supreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
• United States v. Brignoni-Ponce
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 3,736×
• People v. Maury
  California Supreme Court· 2003-06-18· cited 1,120×
• People v. McKay
  California Supreme Court· 2002-03-04· cited 98×
• United States v. Azim Choudhry
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-08-25· cited 58×
• People v. Hart
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-08-23· cited 46×
• People v. Brown
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-03-23· cited 41×
• People v. Grant
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-02-15· cited 33×
• Tyler v. County of Alameda
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-05-03· cited 12×