People v. Bell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant who knew officer was accompanied by K- 9 should expect it would assist search
• noting “patrol car was marked ‘K-9’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Tully
  California Supreme Court· 2012-07-30· cited 629×
• People v. Ayala
  California Supreme Court· 2000-06-08· cited 503×
• State v. Hickman
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-12-26· cited 36×
• People v. Durazo
  California Court of Appeal· 2004-12-02· cited 29×
• People v. Cartwright
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-06-16· cited 27×
• People v. Brendlin
  California Supreme Court· 2006-06-29· cited 18×
• State of Arizona v. Rosa Elene Becerra
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2016-01-25· cited 13×
• People v. Valenzuela
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-09-15· cited 11×
• People v. Castellon
  California Court of Appeal· 1999-12-20· cited 10×
• People v. Nabong
  Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California· 2004-01-14· cited 10×
• People v. $48,715 United States Currency
  California Court of Appeal· 1997-11-07· cited 9×
• State v. Bibbins
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-12-01· cited 8×
• People v. Nabong
  California Supreme Court· 2004-01-14· cited 8×
• State in the Interest of D.K.
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2003-05-01· cited 7×
• People v. Lamont
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-03-30· cited 2×
• Venegas v. County of Los Angeles
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-04-16