People v. Archibald

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Martin is still binding authority, absent intervention by the en banc court or revision of Rule 35(b) by Congress
• defendant must show that denial of sentencing continuance was arbitrary and substantially impacted her ability to receive fair sentence
• defendant required to show prejudice from denial of continuance in order to secure rever- sal
• “[Wjithout any compelling reason for delaying the proceedings, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a continuance.”
• defendant must show that denial of sentenc- ing continuance was arbitrary and substantially impacted her ability to receive fair sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).