People v. Almore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• whether statutory terms have been construed correctly is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
• whether statutory terms have been construed correctly is a question of law, which is reviewed de novo
• the victim and the defendant shared a common dwelling where the victim and his mother (the defendant’s girlfriend) stayed with the defendant in his temporary residence for five consecutive days before the incident, the victim had clothes in the home, and the defendant babysat the victim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Young
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2011-12-15· cited 24×
• People v. Rodriguez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-10-29· cited 17×
• People v. Grant
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2016-06-24· cited 11×
• People v. McCann
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-07-26· cited 2×
• People v. Pence
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2022-07-11· cited 2×
• People v. Bryant
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2021-08-17· cited 2×
• People v. Harris
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2017-01-20· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• People v. Siguenza-Brito
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2009-11-19· cited 629×
• People v. Howard
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2008-04-17· cited 36×
• People v. Young
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-12-22· cited 30×
• People v. Danielle T.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2010-05-13· cited 28×
• Glater v. Fabianich
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-08-12· cited 20×