People v. Danielle T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the children’s statements of sexual abuse corroborated each other’s statements and those statements make it more probable that the children were abused”
• finding that “the children’s statements of sexual abuse corroborated each other’s statements and those statements make it more probable that the children were abused”
• the minor victim’s outcry statements were sufficiently corroborated by statements of siblings and other evidence
• “the children’s statements of sexual abuse corroborated each other’s statements and those statements make it more probable that the children were abused.”
• the minor victim's outcry statements were sufficiently corroborated by statements of siblings and other evidence
• children’s statements of sexual abuse corroborated where they described physical acts of sexual abuse that would be unexpected of children their age

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).