People v. Albert

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a sentencing court is afforded broad discretion in the sources and types of information to be considered when imposing a sentence, including relevant information regarding the defendant’s life and characteristics”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Waclawski
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2009-12-29· cited 528×
• People v. Cain
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-01-25· cited 258×
• People v. Kennebrew
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-03-18· cited 76×
• People v. Crawford
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-02-16· cited 59×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1949-06-06· cited 2,766×
• People v. Milbourn
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 1,306×
• People v. Broden
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1987-07-13· cited 130×
• People v. Williams
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-03-02· cited 40×
• People v. Adams
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1988-06-27· cited 33×
• People v. Poppa
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1992-03-02· cited 21×
• People v. Curry
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1985-05-08· cited 17×
• People v. Jones
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-08-09· cited 8×