Appellate Court of Illinois· 7/30/2001

People v. Abraham

Citations

753 N.E.2d 1219
324 Ill. App. 3d 26
257 Ill. Dec. 593
2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 606

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “the obvious implication of [a] remand order” is for the case to “continue in an ordinary manner”
noting, matters that are implied by the mandate are considered embraced by it
“in any murder case prior attacks against the murder victim are necessarily nonfatal yet have been held probative of intent”
\in any murder case prior attacks against the murder victim are necessarily nonfatal yet have been held probative of intent\
“When a court of review issues a mandate, it vests a trial court with jurisdiction only to take action that conforms with the mandate.”
“Issues not actually decided by the reviewing court, as well as those not at issue in the appeal, may be considered following remand.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grometer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.