People Ex Rel. Williams v. Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Considering the history and nature of habeas corpus, we believe that actual custody is necessary for maintaining this action.”
• rejecting “constructive custody” argument and holding history and nature of habeas corpus requires actual custody to maintain action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cline v. Mirandy
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 2014-11-03· cited 23×
• Sabisch v. Moyer
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-20· cited 13×
• Rennich-Craig v. Russell
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-04-12· cited 8×
• Bostick v. Weber
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2005-01-19· cited 7×
• Caton v. State
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2015-10-02· cited 7×
• Creek v. Clark
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1981-10-21· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jones v. Cunningham
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 1,503×
• People ex rel. Wilder v. Markley
  New York Court of Appeals· 1970-01-07· cited 136×
• People Ex Rel. Johnson v. Pate
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1970-12-04· cited 50×
• People Ex Rel. Abner v. Kinney
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1964-01-22· cited 39×
• People Ex Rel. Titzel v. Hill
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1931-04-23· cited 14×
• People Ex Rel. Petraborg v. Fields
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-10-10· cited 6×
• People Ex Rel. Gwartney v. Meyer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-13· cited 3×